Posted by pecksnif at November 1, 2003 10:48 AM | TrackBack
"It's a good thing the current crop of Democratic candidates weren't running for president in 1944. Instead of defeating Hitler and Tojo, we might have ended up with an "exit strategy" that saved American lives in the short run but cost us our freedom and way of life. Indeed, the Democrats' disgraceful performances to date suggest that most of the candidates would like to cut and run from Iraq, no matter what the consequences. Unfortunately, they've managed to convince a majority of their fellow party members that this is the right thing to do.
"According to the latest Gallup Poll on the issue, 70 percent of Democrats want a full or partial withdrawal of troops from Iraq. Back in April, 54 percent of Democrats fully supported the war. Now, only 24 percent of Democrats — but 88 percent of Republicans — say they still support the war. This kind of partisan polarization is dangerous, especially when the United States faces perhaps the gravest threat in our nation's history. " Cut-and-run chorus
They are called copperheads, a term that comes from the civil war. The copperheads were Democrats who wanted a negotiated end to the war that would have left the confederacy intact.
There have been copperheads around for every war. Mostly, they have failed. Vietnam was their only success. I think that at leasst partly explains the Iraq is Vietnam stuff; They are reliving past (in)glory.
Posted by: Fred Boness on November 1, 2003 01:56 PMFred:
Copperheads is an excellent analogy for today’s left.
The copperhead politicians were decimated in the 1864 election. I hope the same thing will happen to the copperheads in 2004.
Posted by: Jake on November 1, 2003 06:09 PM