February 02, 2004
The survey says ...
| Say Uncle has this "Find your perfect candidate" deal. Here are my results, in order of acceptability. They did not change if I opted for "served in military," over "didn't serve." There's a "compare the candidates" thing too that's interesting. Anyway, I pretty much agree with the machine, but I would have placed Dean in the number two position. Yes, he's a filthy liar (he's a Donk, duh), but I believe many of his extremist positions were made to appeal to the lunatics who control the nominating process. His promise to de-Clintonize the Democrat party gives him one issue that no other Donk will challenge. One Republican who would have taken my #1 spot is Virginia's Sen. George Allen, Jr. Prolly some others too, but I haven't given it that much thought. PS. - Swap Edwards and Sharpton. |  |
hmmmm. I did this a bit back and came out the same except Sharpton was last and Kucinich was 7th. Pretty much what I would have picked off the top of my head.
Posted by: SondraK at February 2, 2004 03:44 PMKoko is 92nd in a field of 8.
Posted by: Rodger Schultz at February 2, 2004 04:00 PMI LOVE Kucinich!
I'm even going to hear him speak on Wednesday...I can't wait. He's my absolute favorite moonbat ever.
And don't forget, I live in Loony LeftyVille...I have seen more Kucinich signs and stickers around here than Dean. Difference is, they're serious.
My husband says he's gonna take Wa. State. I don't doubt it.
How can you not love this guy?
Hey Rodger!
Next week is Virginia's primary but we don't have to register as a Dem to vote-- so who should I vote for? I was leaning toward Sharpton for the entertainment factor -- which 'electable' one do you think would be the easiest for Bush to beat in November?
The test has a flaw. If you click in the spot that prefers a candidate with military experience it excludes Bush in the results. Seems that being a trained fighter pilot and being the reserves doesn't qualify. Serving in the military and then joining a subversive communist organization doesn't seem to taint a military record.
Couldn't have been rigged, could it?
Posted by: Mrs. du Toit at February 3, 2004 12:40 PMHmmm. I purposely tried that, and there was on difference in my results. Let me try again.
Posted by: Rodger Schultz at February 3, 2004 01:01 PMConnie, I just took it again and after selecting "must have military" I was given just 3 choices - Bush, Kerry, Clark
Posted by: Rodger Schultz at February 3, 2004 01:08 PMHet Theresa - go for Koko
Posted by: Rodger Schultz at February 3, 2004 08:01 PM